During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
"It took me six months until I could feel happy again, just emotionally.
，推荐阅读Line官方版本下载获取更多信息
23:25, 27 февраля 2026Мир，这一点在im钱包官方下载中也有详细论述
（十二）开展无资质运营。未经许可或未取得相应资质，擅自从事荐股投资、医疗售药、职业中介、新闻采访、讲经传教等需要特定资质的活动，以及其他法律法规禁止的活动。
值得关注的是，携程在财报中提及，今年 1 月收到国家市场监管总局调查通知，目前调查仍在进行，公司正全力配合监管部门。